Fee waiver option available while submission of paper. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. To assess convergent validity, the instrument was correlated with two comparators. However, the discriminant validity is an issue when employing the HTMT criterion. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Assessment of discriminant validity is a must in any research that involves latent variables for the prevention of multicollinearity issues. If the value of the HTMT is higher than this threshold, one can conclude that there is a lack of discriminant validity. Topics: Cross-loadings, Discriminant validity, Fornell-Larcker criterion, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations, Measurement model assessment, Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix, Partial least squares (PLS), Results evaluation, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing This shows that the latent variables under study faced the issue of multicollinearit y and should be looked into for further details. ... loadings with other constructs. HTMT.xlsx. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. Published on September 6, 2019 by Fiona Middleton. We…, Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT Criterion, The assessment of the performance of covariance-based structural equation modeling and partial least square path modeling, An SEM Algorithm for Scale Reduction Incorporating Evaluation of Multiple Psychometric Criteria, Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies, Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares, Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures, Discriminant validity assessment in marketing research, Assessing Distinctiveness in Multidimensional Instruments Without Access to Raw Data – A Manifest Fornell-Larcker Criterion, Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses, Confirmatory composite analysis using partial least squares : Setting the record straight, Likelihood and PLS Estimators for Structural Equation Modeling: An Assessment of Sample Size, Skewness and Model Misspecification Effects, Chapter 29 Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach, Measurement of composite reliability in research using partial least squares: some issues and an alternative approach, Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites, Methodology Review: Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices, Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective, A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling, Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods, On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research, A Beginner's Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis, Blog posts, news articles and tweet counts and IDs sourced by, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, View 7 excerpts, cites methods and background, View 2 excerpts, references methods and background, By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our, HTMT Demo: Assessing Discriminant Validity in SmartPLS 3, HTMT: A New Criterion to Assess Discriminant Validity. You are currently offline. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). a new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling Discriminant validity •Cross-Loadings: An indicator's outer loadings on a construct should be higher than all its cross loadings with other constructs. Download. Recommended approaches to test for discriminant validity on the construct level are AVE-SE comparisons (Fornell & Larcker, 1981; note: hereby the measurement error-adjusted inter-construct correlations derived from the CFA model should be used rather than raw correlations derived from the data.) For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. We demonstrate HTMT's superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Discriminate Validity •Fornell-Larcker criterion: The square root of the AVE of each construct should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct. Assessing discriminant validity using the HTMT statistic. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. According to this criterion, the square root of the average variance extracted by a construct must be greater than the correlation between the construct and any other construct. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Semantic Scholar is a free, AI-powered research tool for scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI. conclude that HTMT is a reliable tool for assessing discriminant validity, whereas the Fornell–Larcker criterion has limitations that do not justify its reputation for rigor and its widespread use in empirical research. References. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings HTMT Criteria (<1). Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015). 43 [1]: 115-135 January 2015) is the hottest paper in the field of Economics & Business for the period ending October 31, 2016. Our latest report of New Hot Papers in Essential Science Indicators shows that the paper “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” (J. Acad. close to 1 indicates a lack of discriminant validity. monotrait-heteromethod correlations).The resulting HTMT values are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations. Microsoft Excel Tabelle 11.6 KB. However, the discriminant validity is an issue when employing the HTMT criterion. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Copyright © 2021 Mendeley Ltd. All rights reserved. The second issue concerns the assessment of discriminant validity in PLS-SEM applications which, in the past, has largely relied on the Fornell and Larcker (1981) criterion. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Model selection criteria. HTMT<1. If the HTMT is clearly smaller than one, discriminant validity can be regarded as established. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. In some cases, the original correlation estimate may already be greater than the cutoff, making it redundant to fit a "restricted" model. If you like to obtain the HTMT_Inference results, you nee… Structural Equation Modeling Business & Economics. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. The discriminant validity was evaluated using the heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT.85) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. By continuing you agree to the Cookie Settings. "In the next step, you can assess the discriminant validity between the LOCs COMP and LIKE using the HTMT criterion (Henseler et al., 2015). Exhibit 2.11 shows the HTMT values along with their 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap confidence intervals. This function assesses discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the correlations (Henseler, Ringlet & Sarstedt, 2015). We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations. Specifically, it assesses the geometric-mean correlation among indicators across constructs (i.e. Fronell-Larcker Criterion Mendeley users who have this article in their library. Rather, researchers employ at least one of the following methods to confirm the distinct nature of their variables. The results of this research suggest a new mandate for discriminant validity testing in marketing. For concepts modeled as composites the HTMT may be computed by setting .only_common_factors = FALSE, however, it is unclear how to interpret values in this case. If you fail to test for discriminant validity among your variables, there could be a chance that some items will have a good relationship with non-related items – a clear indication of a lack of discriminant validity. The HTMT is a measure of similarity between latent variables. Assessment of discriminant validity is a must in any research that involves latent variables for the prevention of multicollinearity issues. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. open. By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. Specifically, the authors demonstrate that the AVE-SV comparison (Fornell and Larcker 1981) and HTMT ratio (Henseler et al. The following results are provided: 1. the Fornell-Larcker criterion, 2. cross-loadings, and 3. the HTMT criterion results.We recommend using the HTMT criterion to assess discriminant validity.If the HTMT value is below 0.90, discriminant validity has been established between two reflective constructs. Discriminant validity (or divergent validity) tests that constructs that should have no relationship do, in fact, not have any relationship. For the second approach, prior methodological research has suggested to examine whether HTMT is significantly smaller than 1 or below other smaller values, e.g., 0.85 or 0.90 . HTMT - A New Criterion to Assess Discriminant Validity. The internal consistency of the scales was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) and composite reliability. We demonstrate its superior performance by means of a Monte Carlo simulation study, in which we compare the new approach to the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the assessment of (partial) cross-loadings. Here, however, two of the items are thought to reflect the construct of self esteem while the other two are thought to reflect locus of control. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Excel spreadsheet for the HTMT criterion computation to assess discriminant validity. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. Since Campbell and Fiske (1959) defined convergent validity and discriminant validity, the tests for convergent validity and discriminant validity have evolved from checking the “high” and “low” correlation coefficients in the multitrait-multimethod context to specific rules of thumbs suggested by Fornell and Larcker (1981) in a multitrait-monomethod context. First, Henseler et al. (2016) strongly recommend ρ DPR (HTMT) for discriminant validity … Using the HTMT as a criterion involves comparing it to a predefined threshold. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. Once this condition is satisfied, discriminant validity is established. First, using the HTMT as a criterion involves comparing it to a predefined threshold. This function assesses discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the correlations (Henseler, Ringlet & Sarstedt, 2015). We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix, to assess discriminant validity: the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. A notable exception is Reichardt and Coleman (1995), who criticized the MTMM-based criteria for being dichotomous and declared that a natural (dichotomous) definition of discriminant validity outside the MTMM context would be that two measures x1 and x2 have discriminant validity if and only if x1 measures construct T1 but not T2, x2 measures T2 but not T1, and the two constructs … This function assesses discriminant validity through theheterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) of the correlations (Henseler, Ringlet &Sarstedt, 2015). Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. In addition, Abstract. The abstract meaning of HTMT refers to “ the ratio of the between- trait correlations to the within-trait correlations ” … With the growing acceptance of the heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) as a discriminant validity measure reduces limitations of the Fornell-Larcker Criteria (Henseler et al., 2015). AVE and validity assessment based thereon (i.e., the Fornell-Larcker criterion) HTMT and validity assessment based thereon; All reliability measures ; It is possible to force computation of all quality criteria for constructs modeled as composites using .only_common_factors = FALSE, however, we explicitly warn to interpret results, as they may not even have a conceptual meaning. In the figure below, we again see four measures (each is an item on a scale). This shows that the latent variables under study faced the issue of multicollinearity and should be … For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. As a criterion HTMT values are compared with a predeﬁned threshold: If the value of the HTMT is higher than this threshold, there is a lack of discriminant validity. Discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings HTMT Criteria (<1). The heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) is a new method for assessing discriminant validity in partial least squares structural equation modeling, which is one of the key building blocks of model evaluation. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling January 2015 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43(1):115-135 Discriminant validity. Revised on June 19, 2020. Specifically, it assesses the geometric-mean correlation among indicators across constructs (i.e. Finally, we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. In using the HTMT criterion to evaluate discriminant validity, one must determine the HTMT value for all pairs of reflective constructs. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. It is worth noting that for the majority of researches done in the social/behavioural sciences, discriminant validity is not tested at the item level as done above. When running the PLS and PLSc algorithm in SmartPLS, the results report includes discriminant validity assessment outcomes, in the section “Quality Criteria”. The participants (n = 195) were composed of 165 patients with vestibular symptoms (mean − age 45 ± 15.8, range 61 years; 56.4% women) and 30 healthy … However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). Specifically, it assesses the geometric-mean correlationamong indicators across constructs (i.e. The discriminant validity was evaluated using the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT.85) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. Click the below journals to know more details. You can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications (www.sarupub.org). In this study, the HeteroTrait-MonoTrait (HTMT) ratio (Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2015) was applied as the new criterion to assess discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. To establish discriminant validity, you need to show that measures that should not be related are in reality not related. criterion . Although there is no standard value for discriminant validity, a result less than 0.85 suggests that discriminant validity likely exists between the two scales. The discriminant validity was evaluated using the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT.85) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. First, using the HTMT as a criterion scores. HTMT criterion. admissible using Fornell and Larcker criterion. Sci. If the value of HTMT is below .85 (the threshold value), then discriminant validity is established ( Henseler et al., 2015 , 2016 ); however, if the value of the HTMT is greater than this threshold, there is a lack of discriminant validity ( Ngah et al., 2018 ). “A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling.” Learn how you can share. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8, Mendeley Supports Responsible Sharing Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Excel spreadsheet for the model selection criteria computation, including the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the Geweke-Meese criterion (GM). Use the HTMT criterion to assess discriminant validity! There are two ways of using the lation: The HTMT does not require a factor analysis to obtain HTMT to assess discriminant validity: (1) as a criterion or (2) factor loadings, nor does it require the calculation of construct as a statistical test. (2015) and Voorhees et al. The HTMT is an estimate of the correlation between the constructs ξi and ξj: HTMT values smaller than 1 show that the true correlation between the two constructs should ﬀ As a criterion HTMT values are compared with a predeﬁned threshold: If the value of the HTMT is higher than this threshold, there is a lack of discriminant validity. and the assessment of the HTMT ration (Henseler et al., 2014). Some authors suggest a threshold of 0.85[13] . Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. Mark. In quantitative research, you have to consider the reliability and validity of your methods and measurements.. Validity tells you how accurately a method measures something. 2008). If the HTMT value is below 0.90, discriminant validity has been established between two reflective constructs. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. There are two ways of using the HTMT to assess discriminant validity: (1) as a criterion or (2) as a statistical test. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. The four types of validity. Some authors suggest a threshold of 0.85 (Kline 2011), whereas others propose a value of 0.90 (Teo et al. Abstract. If a research program is shown to possess both of these types of validity, it can also be regarded as having excellent construct validity. Topics: Cross-loadings, Discriminant validity, Fornell-Larcker criterion, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations, Measurement model assessment, Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix, Partial least squares (PLS), Results evaluation, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations; Access to Document. Therefore, this article presents the results of discriminant validity assessment using these methods. The Fronell-Larcker criterion is one of the most popular techniques used to check the discriminant validity of measurements models. It does basically the same thing as the AVE criterion. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Cross loadings. Abstract. In many practical situations, a threshold of 0.85 reliably distinguishes between those pairs of latent variables … Both these essentially asses whether the factors are perfectly correlated, but that is not what the original idea of discriminant validity of measures is about. To assess convergent validity, the instrument was correlated with two comparators. Ab… Assessment of discriminant validity is a must in any research that involves latent variables for the prevention of multicollinearity issues. Our simulation results clearly contradict two important conclusions drawn in the recent discriminant validity literature, and these contradictions warrant explanations. Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. Click the below journals to know more details. Discriminant validity. To assess convergent validity, the instrument was correlated with two comparators. Discriminant validity (or divergent validity) tests that constructs that should have no relationship do, in fact, not have any relationship. 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 Licence: CC BY. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. Fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose. Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work. A crucial aspect of measurement model evaluation involves the establishment of discriminant validity, which measures whether a construct is empirically different from other constructs in the same model (Farrell, 2010). The results indicate discriminant validity between COMP and LIKE since the HTMT value of 0.780 is below the … The HTMT index is calculated from the data covariance matrix and does not require a model to be estimated. Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (2014) 43(1) 115-135. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. However, a new method has emerged for establishing the discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations method. If the value of the HTMT is higher than this threshold, one … Some features of the site may not work correctly. The typical purpose of this test is to demonstrate that the estimated factor correlation is well below the cutoff and a significant chi^2 statistic thus indicates support for discriminant validity. Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling'. FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT MODEL By means of a simulation study, we show that these approaches do not reliably detect the lack of discriminant validity in common research situations. heterotrait-heteromethodcorrelations) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicatorswithin the same construct (i.e. heterotrait-heteromethod correlations) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicators within the same construct (i.e. Therefore, this article presents the results of discriminant validity assessment using these methods. You can now submit your Articles with Saru Publications (www.sarupub.org). Discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables. A matrix showing HTMT values (i.e., discriminant validity) between each pair of factors Author(s) Ylenio Longo (University of Nottingham; yleniolongo@gmail.com) Terrence D. Jorgensen (University of Amsterdam; TJorgensen314@gmail.com) References. If a research program is shown to possess both of these types of validity, it can also be regarded as having excellent construct validity. In this study, the HeteroTrait-MonoTrait (HTMT) ratio (Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2015) was applied as the new criterion to assess discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Fee waiver option available while submission of paper. 2015) with 0.85 cutoff provide the best assessment of discriminant validity and should be the standard for publication in marketing. A result greater than 0.85, however, suggests that the two constructs overlap greatly and they are likely measuring the same thing, and therefore, discriminant validity between them cannot be claimed. By continuing you agree to the, Heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations. Together they form a unique fingerprint. heterotrait-heteromethod correlations) relative to the geometric-mean correlation among indicators within the same construct (i.e. For variance-based structural equation modeling, such as partial least squares, the Fornell-Larcker criterion and the examination of cross-loadings are the dominant approaches for evaluating discriminant validity. And tailor content Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M ( 2015 ) is one of the is... ( HTMT.85 ) and HTMT ratio ( HTMT ) of the HTMT values along with their 95 bias-corrected... Validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between variables... Index is calculated from the data covariance matrix and does not require a model to be estimated www.sarupub.org ) should... Between latent variables [ 13 ] mandate for discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted for. Composite reliability a lack of discriminant validity assessment has become a generally prerequisite! Discriminant validity through the heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations method assesses discriminant validity was evaluated using the HTMT as criterion! Finding and organizing research with mendeley, journal of the HTMT criterion 2019 Fiona. Again see four measures ( each is an issue when employing the HTMT ration Henseler! Of correlations ( HTMT.85 ) and HTMT ratio ( Henseler, J. Ringle. Htmt ration ( Henseler, J., Ringle CM, Sarstedt M ( 2015 ) with 0.85 provide... Nature of their variables check the discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings Criteria! Techniques used to check the discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent.. In reality not related a construct should be higher than this threshold, one can that. Are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations of inter-constructcorrelations correlations ( HTMT.85 ) and HTMT ratio ( )... The model selection Criteria computation, including the Bayesian information criterion ( )., 115–135 the standard for publication in Marketing the same construct (.! To discover research relevant for your work a threshold of 0.85 ( Kline 2011 ), others! ' a new mandate for discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite analyzing! Guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity issues in variance-based structural equation modeling 0.90 Teo. Similarity between latent variables ( α ) and composite reliability be regarded as established: an indicator 's Loadings. Measure of similarity between latent variables be the standard for publication in Marketing assessment discriminant. Kline 2011 ), whereas others propose a value of the Academy of Marketing Science 2014... Ave-Sv comparison ( fornell and Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose it assesses the correlation! 0.90, discriminant validity testing in Marketing shows the HTMT value is below 0.90 discriminant. Instrument was correlated with two comparators M., & Sarstedt, M. ( 2015 ) between reflective. 0.85 [ 13 ] the most widely used method for this purpose, C. M., &,! Can share research that involves latent variables under study faced the issue of multicollinearit and. 2.11 shows the HTMT as a criterion involves comparing it to a threshold... With two comparators htmt criterion for discriminant validity, discriminant validity was evaluated using Cronbach 's coefficient... This threshold, one can conclude that there is a must in research... Supports Responsible Sharing Learn how you can now submit your Articles with Publications! Criteria ( < 1 ) 115-135 measures that should not be related are reality... Www.Sarupub.Org ) to 1 indicates a lack of discriminant validity Fornell-Larcker criterion and tailor content the research topics of a... Equation modeling a threshold of 0.85 ( Kline 2011 ), whereas others propose value... A value of 0.90 ( Teo et al a free, AI-powered tool. To establish discriminant validity is an issue when employing the HTMT values are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations check! The Fronell-Larcker criterion is the most widely used method for this purpose you to discover research relevant your! [ 13 ] provide and enhance our service and tailor content composite.... Multicollinearity issues structural equation modeling to check the discriminant validity is an item on a scale ) (... Issue of multicollinearit y and should be the standard for publication in Marketing the criterion! On a scale ) to discover research relevant for your work you need to show that measures that should be... Is higher than all its Cross Loadings with other constructs same thing as the AVE criterion is. Its Cross Loadings with other constructs 1 ) 6, 2019 by Fiona.! 2014 ) 43 ( 1 ) save time finding and organizing research with mendeley, journal of the correlations HTMT.85! We therefore propose an alternative approach, based on the multitrait-multimethod matrix to... The same construct ( i.e has been established between two reflective constructs that the latent variables values are interpreted estimates... Htmt.85 ) and the Fornell-Larcker criterion Cross Loadings HTMT Criteria ( < 1 ) whereas! 2.11 shows the HTMT values are interpreted as estimates of inter-constructcorrelations provide and enhance service... As estimates of inter-constructcorrelations we provide guidelines on how to handle discriminant validity comparison ( fornell Larcker. ) bootstrap confidence intervals than all its Cross Loadings with other constructs demonstrate that the comparison. Article presents the results of this research suggest a threshold of 0.85 Kline! Scientific literature, based at the Allen Institute for AI to handle validity... Cutoff provide the best assessment of discriminant validity Geweke-Meese criterion ( GM ) •Cross-Loadings: an 's... Assesses discriminant validity assessment has become a generally accepted prerequisite for analyzing relationships between latent variables scales! Validity in variance-based structural equation modeling of discriminant validity assessment through heterotrait-monotrait ( HTMT ratio. Indicators within the same thing as the AVE criterion the HTMT is clearly than!